<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mohammed Bushra &#8211; Week One Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/2009/09/16/mohammed-bushra-week-one-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/2009/09/16/mohammed-bushra-week-one-questions/</link>
	<description>Just another P2PU Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:38:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it appropriate to start talking about a neurocentric age? &#171; ξένία</title>
		<link>http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/2009/09/16/mohammed-bushra-week-one-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it appropriate to start talking about a neurocentric age? &#171; ξένία</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/?p=120#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] Like Mohammed, I believe this can only be determined in retrospect. Strikingly, Generations of humans before us didn&#8217;t even know what the brain was for. Aristotle for example thought the brain&#8217;s function was to cool the blood. Considering how little was known about the seat of the mind until fairly recently in history, it doesn&#8217;t sound wrong to talk about a &#8220;neuroaware&#8221; age. neurocentism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like Mohammed, I believe this can only be determined in retrospect. Strikingly, Generations of humans before us didn&#8217;t even know what the brain was for. Aristotle for example thought the brain&#8217;s function was to cool the blood. Considering how little was known about the seat of the mind until fairly recently in history, it doesn&#8217;t sound wrong to talk about a &#8220;neuroaware&#8221; age. neurocentism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neuroethics and International Biolaw&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Xenia: Is it appropriate to start talking about a neurocentric age?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/2009/09/16/mohammed-bushra-week-one-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Neuroethics and International Biolaw&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Xenia: Is it appropriate to start talking about a neurocentric age?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.p2pu.org/neurobiolaw/?p=120#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] Like Mohammed, I believe this can only be determined in retrospect. Strikingly, Generations of humans before us didn&#8217;t even know what the brain was for. Aristotle for example thought the brain&#8217;s function was to cool the blood. Considering how little was known about the seat of the mind until fairly recently in history, it doesn&#8217;t sound wrong to talk about a &#8220;neuroaware&#8221; age. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like Mohammed, I believe this can only be determined in retrospect. Strikingly, Generations of humans before us didn&#8217;t even know what the brain was for. Aristotle for example thought the brain&#8217;s function was to cool the blood. Considering how little was known about the seat of the mind until fairly recently in history, it doesn&#8217;t sound wrong to talk about a &#8220;neuroaware&#8221; age. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

