CYBERPUNK AND SCIENCE FICTION
September 14th, 2009 at 21:39“Critics, myself included, persist in label-mongering, despite all warnings; we must, because it’s a valid source of insight-as well as great fun.”
– Bruce Sterling, from the introduction to Mirrorshades1
The topic of this essay is – I believe – something of a red herring. How can one differentiate between a genre that has steadfastly withstood attempts at defining it, from one of its most rebellious sub-genres? Encyclopedia Britannica attempts to define science fiction as:
“a form of fiction that deals principally with the impact of actual or imagined science upon society or individuals. The term science fiction was popularized, if not invented, in the 1920s by one of the genre’s principal advocates, the American publisher Hugo Gernsback.”2
But any aficionado of the genre will tell you it’s so much more than that, encompassing themes that range from space-adventure, to psychic abilities, to alternative realities. From the amazing, to the bizarre. Stories that examine human nature, politics, and social issues.
And then we come to the subject of our study, cyberpunk: Britannica takes a valiant stab at defining cyberpunk thus:
“The word cyberpunk was coined by writer Bruce Bethke, who wrote a story with that title in 1982. He derived the term from the words cybernetics, the science of replacing human functions with computerized ones, and punk, the cacophonous music and nihilistic sensibility that developed in the youth culture during the 1970s and ’80s. Science-fiction editor Gardner Dozois is generally credited with having popularized the term.” 3
Once again, the cold definition falls far short of reality. Cyberpunk, with its dystopian settings and themes of post-humanism, post-industrialism and post-nationalism,4 managed to extend the science fiction genre and create new frontiers.
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep is archetypal science fiction, in that it envisages a post-nuclear war future-world where most of humankind is forced to colonize Mars. Where it crosses into cyberpunk is mainly in the ‘film noir’ elements: the flawed ‘cop’ who is not driven necessarily by justice, but by money. The outcast who aids and then deceives the renegade androids. And finally, the androids themselves, who come across as more human than the de-humanised humans that hunt them.
Protagonist Rick Deckard of Electric Sheep is a bureaucrat, who sees himself as no different than his neighbours, despite his dangerous job. He is motivated most of all by the idea of owning a rare animal. While initially whimsical, it becomes clear that the populace has transferred the focus of its consumerism to the animals that have survived the nuclear holocaust, partly (I presume) because jewelery and fancy vehicles are no longer available. Rachael realises this, and takes revenge on him by killing Rick’s brand new goat. So Dick’s androids can be emotional, spiteful even… they just don’t have empathy, which sets them apart from humans.
Another factor seems to be the concept of emotional stress and depression. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World has soma, a drug that enables one to cope with the stresses of everyday life, or even take a chemical ‘holiday’. Electric Sheep has the Penfield mood organ, an electronic antidepressant. While Rick seems perfectly happy to use it to control his moods, his wife seems to regard it with animosity, as if the moods are somehow not genuine. Dick amusingly takes a ‘swipe’ at the prevailing chauvinist trend in mainstream SF, with Rick setting his wife’s mood organ to “594; pleased acknowledgment of husband’s superior wisdom in all matters”. Perhaps then, we can start to consider cyberpunk as a more intelligent form of science fiction?
This novel was also a critique (on a certain level) of a society controlled by an apparently benevolent dictatorship: the world seems to be controlled by corporations… android producers and Mars colonizers. The corporations mirror those of today: as long as there is a profit, they are in business. Human rights fall expediently by the wayside, and they milk their client-base, whatever the cost. (Shades of Haliburton?) So one may extrapolate that this story has elements of community anarchism underpinning it, which could reflect a yearning on the author’s part for an escape from the realities of the Vietnam and the Cold War.
Conclusion:
Inasmuch as cyberpunk is a sub-genre of science fiction, I suggest that Electric Sheep is a science fiction story, with pioneering cyberpunk elements.
1Quoted by Lawrence Person in “Notes Toward a Postcyberpunk Manifesto” at http://slashdot.org/features/99/10/08/2123255.shtml
2http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/528857/science-fiction/235713/The-evolution-of-science-fiction
3http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/147816/cyberpunk
4http://www.cyberartsweb.org/cpace/scifi/cyberbib/Essays/DefiningCpunk.html
Tags: Coursework, Week1
September 15th, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Hah – you were wise to the trick in the original question…
One of the things that I love the most about good cyberpunk (and let’s be honest, there is a lot of lousy cyberpunk out there in the world) is the very humanness of the characters in the novels. They can be funny, cruel, complex and sad, just like characters in more traditional forms of the novel, and I think it’s an aspect overlooked by a lot of cyberpunk critics who dismiss the genre as pulpy geek fiction.
September 15th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Hi, I’m a student on the neuroscience and international biolaw course but almost applied of this one and thought I would follow along!
I certainly was intruiged to see “Electric Sheep” named as the first week’s reading, because like much of Dick’s work, for me it really defies labelling within the boundaries of the work that has come after it ( which is why it si so compelling). For me I read “Electric Sheep” after having watched bladerunner, and my perception was that the latter was much more “cyberpunk” than the former. Amongst Dick’s work i would say that from my perspective the mind warping Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said was the most “cyberpunk”. It was very interesting to read your perspectives
September 15th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Having just read Electric Sheep for the first time, and from the perceptive of judging it as a Cyberpunk novel, I made a conscious effort to pick out the Cyberpunk elements of the novel. I think one of the elements that reeks the most of the genre is that a large portion of the population spends time in a virtual reality. Although the author doesn’t refer to it as such, The empathy boxes seem to me to be very similar to a computerized device used to generate a virtual reality. Another Cyberpunk element is the extent that the population is influenced by Buster Friendly and his busty guests (please forgive me for making that pun). The influence of media on a population is a common motif in many Cyberpunk yarns.
September 16th, 2009 at 7:29 am
A great piece
I liked the way you touched on emotional stress and depression. The use of drugs to deal with depression and stress feature heavily in cyberpunk, and reading your essay reminded me of Prozium from Equilibrium which was probably one of the most memorable examples: where a drug is used to eradicate all feelings; that its our emotions that make human beings dangerous and the only way to have a safe, orderly society is to eradicate all feeling.
It also reminds me of one of the most memorable quotes I remember from a Star Trek movie when Sybok offers to remove Kirk’s pain, and McCoy tries to convince him to do it, to which Kirk retorts:
“Damn it, Bones, you’re a doctor. You know that pain and guilt can’t be taken away with a wave of a magic wand. They’re the things we carry with us, the things that make us who we are. If we lose them, we lose ourselves. I don’t want my pain taken away! I need my pain!”
September 16th, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Oh yes, the Penfield organ; it is amazing to see humans use pre-designed moods to choose from, like greeting cards; and in the same time watching androids developing genuine emotions.
September 16th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
The idea that androids can be more human than humans is a chilling commentary – not on the capabilities of advanced technology, but on the depths that people are capable of sinking to. One way for machines to eclipse humans is for humans to continually lower the bar… =(