Comments on: Case 3: Orange Group http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/2009/09/29/case-3-orange-group/ Just another P2PU Blogs weblog Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:18:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: andrewrens http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/2009/09/29/case-3-orange-group/comment-page-1/#comment-88 andrewrens Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:29:54 +0000 http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/?p=120#comment-88 Assessment 8/10 Assessment 8/10

]]> By: andrewrens http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/2009/09/29/case-3-orange-group/comment-page-1/#comment-81 andrewrens Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:41:28 +0000 http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/?p=120#comment-81 It would have been useful to compare what latitude is afforded by applying the fair dealing/educational exceptions standard to that which is granted under statutory and blanket licences. It is unclear from this answer whether the application of institutional guidelines or licences makes the usual statutory exceptions non applicable. Does it? Can it? It would have been useful to compare what latitude is afforded by applying the fair dealing/educational exceptions standard to that which is granted under statutory and blanket licences.

It is unclear from this answer whether the application of institutional guidelines or licences makes the usual statutory exceptions non applicable. Does it? Can it?

]]> By: karienbez http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/2009/09/29/case-3-orange-group/comment-page-1/#comment-51 karienbez Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:59:54 +0000 http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/?p=120#comment-51 Yellow Group assessment of Orange Group Case Study 3: Overall assessment: 7/10 Comments: In this response the Orange Group clearly demonstrated that they are familiar with the relevant legal provisions and licensing options. They also included very useful information such as the recommended tariff rates for blanket licences in Canada. However, their response could still leave Francesca uncertain about her exact legal position and what to practically do about it. They could have been clearer on what their specific conclusions were. Otherwise good. Yellow Group assessment of Orange Group Case Study 3:

Overall assessment: 7/10
Comments: In this response the Orange Group clearly demonstrated that they are familiar with the relevant legal provisions and licensing options. They also included very useful information such as the recommended tariff rates for blanket licences in Canada. However, their response could still leave Francesca uncertain about her exact legal position and what to practically do about it. They could have been clearer on what their specific conclusions were. Otherwise good.

]]> By: tomcaswell http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/2009/09/29/case-3-orange-group/comment-page-1/#comment-15 tomcaswell Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:42:46 +0000 http://blogs.p2pu.org/copy/?p=120#comment-15 Assessment of Orange Group's Case 3 by Pink Group Overall score 8/10 Comments: The orange group gave a combined answer for case study 3, citing Canadian copyright law. The structure of the response was a bit confusing because the first few paragraphs explored the blanket license option for Francesca's situation, but the conclusion seemed to suggest that she should claim the 10% fair-dealing provision as long as she had not copied more than that amount. While the limited description of the content Francesca had copied onto her overhead transparency certainly left many unanswered questions, the orange group's response seemed to take more than one position on the question of appropriate licensing without really explaining why that might have been necessary. Overall it was still a reasonable, clearly articulated response. Assessment of Orange Group’s Case 3 by Pink Group
Overall score 8/10
Comments: The orange group gave a combined answer for case study 3, citing Canadian copyright law. The structure of the response was a bit confusing because the first few paragraphs explored the blanket license option for Francesca’s situation, but the conclusion seemed to suggest that she should claim the 10% fair-dealing provision as long as she had not copied more than that amount. While the limited description of the content Francesca had copied onto her overhead transparency certainly left many unanswered questions, the orange group’s response seemed to take more than one position on the question of appropriate licensing without really explaining why that might have been necessary. Overall it was still a reasonable, clearly articulated response.

]]>