Open Creative Non-Fiction Writing

Response to Dineh’s “The Perpetual Procrastinator”

October 7th, 2009 at 18:29

Dineh,

I really enjoyed reading this piece; it was highly amusing and very cleverly written. I wonder who it describes? Viola—is she an alter ego of the narrator from the first week? Is this to further characterize that narrator–to demonstrate her multifaceted nature? There’s a bit of youth and reckless fun in this piece; perhaps it might show as a her night time personality, or a flashback to a bit of her past. I don’t know how to really connect the two, but you might not want to. Is this about the same place from Week 1?

I think this would actually enrichen the character from week 1, if you attempted the connection. If so, you should work on a transition, how the narrator from week 1 hates getting up in the mornings—what do the mornings remind her of, represent to her? How did she come up with this Viola person? Etc.

I would like more about Viola’s experiences copy-writing, and in writing odd jobs throughout her life, as it seems to have played an important role in shaping her character. Her boss is ephemeral; can you make him concrete? Is he balding? Is he kind? He’s comes off as a Keelber elf here–the one thing he says. I think it would be fruitful to juxtapose the fantasy like nature of this piece with something that jolts it back down to earth, ie. I loved the line “Though, technically speaking, the job description leaned far more toward copy-writing.” It demonstrates a sense of humor on part of the author, poking fun at her own character, herself, which is always valuable. My comments in-line: CNF_Week3_NtantisoThirdPerson – JP Comments.

2 Responses to “Response to Dineh’s “The Perpetual Procrastinator””

  1. ntantiso Says:

    Hi Jane, Thanks for the comments! They all make very good sense. In my very long blog of the previous week (prior to submitting the whole new piece about Viola) I had explained in some detail why I needed to start from scratch. But obviously, both these characters are “ultimately” ME;-) So, you’re right, I could somehow try to rethink this and connect the two. However, in reality the only common thread is the “place” of visitation and therefore the continuity of my photos from day into night: and, of course, the place is the seat of memories past & present. I’ll think about your suggestions and see how I can reconcile that with nearly the opposite impressions that I created for Lee in this second piece. I’ll definitely need to sleep on this!

  2. Jeffery Stamey Says:

    This is a very important post, I was looking for this information. Just so you know I located your website when I was searching for blogs like mine, so please check out my site sometime and leave me a comment to let me know what you think.

Leave a Reply